Acts of the Apostles
HomeBook of ActsOutline of ActsLuke the HistorianMajor ThemesPentecostThe First MartyrSaul's ConversionApostle PaulMissionary JourneysApostle PeterThe Twelve ApostlesCorneliusPlaces & EventsLife & TimesFurther ReadingFAQsLinksOther ResourcesFaithful Journey
Luke the Historian

In his preface, Luke wrote two books. The first was his Gospel, also known as the "former book," and the second was Acts. Both are dedicated to Theophilus and both are written in the same literary Greek style. 

Luke claimed he was writing accurate history:

"Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eye-witnesses and servants of the word. Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught."

Referring to "things that have been fulfilled among us," Luke apparently is saying these events were't random nor unexpected, but took place to fulfill Old Testament prophecy.

Next, Luke is talking about the apostles who witnessed the historical Jesus and who handed down to others what they had seen and heard. Luke also personally researched events, "carefully investigating everything from the beginning." Finally, he wrote an "orderly account" and addressed it to Theophilus and other readers.

Luke was well qualified to write history. He was an educated doctor and a cultured Greek, with a wide vocabulary and powers of observation. He was also Paul's traveling companion and had plenty of opportunity to hear and absorb the apostle's teaching and to write a personal travelogue of his experiences.

In addition, Luke lived in Palestine for about two years and gathered material through interviews for his Gospel and for Acts. He was familiar with Jewish history, customs and festivals, and visited places where Jesus and his disciples walked.

Many notable historians and archaeologists have defended the reliability of Luke's written account. Among them are Sir William Ramsey, the Scottish writer, who placed "the author of Acts among the historians of the first rank." A. N. Sherwin-White, of Oxford University, said that Luke's "historical framework is exact. In terms of time and place the details are precise and correct."